RE: Edwin and Avis Smith, Application #6F0391-1-EB, Dismissal Order (March 23, 1995) Page # VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 Re: Edwin & Avis Smith, Application #6F0391-1-EB DISMISSAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT On December 23, 1994, the District #6 Environmental Commission issued Partial Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order ("Decision") in which it denied application #6F0391-1 ("Application"). The Application, which was filed by Edwin and Avis Smith, Applicants below and Appellants herein, sought approval of a master plan for the development of the Smith Farm, located off Route 104 in St. Albans, Vermont. On January 11, 1995, the Appellants, by and through their attorney, Carl H. Lisman, Esq., filed an appeal with the Environmental Board from the Decision ("Appeal"). The Appellants contended that the District Commission erred when it reviewed the master plan pursuant to the Act 250 criteria. The Appellants asserted that the District Commission should have limited its review of the master plan to the terms and provisions of Condition #20 of Land Use Permit #6F0391-EB. Michael and JoAnn Manahan and Randall Messier each filed a timely petition for party status in the Appeal. On Monday February 13, 1995, after due notice, the Board Chair, John T. Ewing, convened a prehearing conference ("Conference") in this matter. Michael and JoAnn Manahan, the Agency of Natural Resources ("ANR"), by and through its attorney, Kurt Janson, Esq., and several non-party status petitioners attended the Conference. On February 24, 1995, the Appellants filed a Motion to Withdraw ("Motion") by which they sought permission to withdraw the Appeal. By letter dated February 28, 1995, ANR requested that the Board grant the Motion. No other responses to the Motion were filed. On March 2, 1995, Board Chair, Ewing, granted the Motion and stayed all filing deadlines orally agreed upon by the parties at the Conference until further order of the Board Chair or Board. On March 22, 1995, in Montpelier, Vermont, the Board, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 18 (D), moved to dismiss the Appeal. Immediately thereafter, it deliberated on its own motion. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Dismissal of this matter is not contrary to the values embodied in Act 250. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this matter shall be and is hereby DISMISSED. Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this 23rd day of March, 1995. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD s/s/ John T. Ewing _________________________ John T. Ewing, Chair John Martin Farmer Arthur Gibb Marcy Harding Samuel Lloyd William Martinez Rebecca Nawrath Steve E. Wright c:\wp51\decision\6F0391-1.dis (v) a:6F0391-1.dis (v27)